Clostridium to treat cancer: dream or reality?
Editorial

Clostridium to treat cancer: dream or reality?

Jan Theys, Philippe Lambin

Maastro (Maastricht Radiation Oncology), Research institute GROW, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Jan Theys, PhD. Maastro Lab, University of Maastricht, Postbox 616, UNS 50/23, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. Email: jan.theys@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Abstract: In their paper “Intratumoral injection of Clostridium novyi-NT spores induces antitumor responses”, Roberts et al. describe the induction of antitumor responses following local spore administration of an attenuated C. novyi strain (C. novyi-NT). Stereotactic intratumoral spore injection led to significant survival advantages in a murine orthotopic brain model and local bacterial treatment produced robust responses in a set of spontaneous canine soft tissue carcinomas. Their preclinical findings in both models, provided the basis for a phase 1 investigational clinical study in patients with solid tumors that were either refractory to standard treatment or without an available standard treatment available (NCT01924689). The results of the first patient enrolled in this trial, a 53-year-old female with a retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, are described. Next to the non-armed C. novyi-NT described in this paper, very potent genetically modified Clostridium expressing anti-cancer therapeutic genes are also being developed. Are treatments with these non-pathogenic clostridia a viable alternative cancer treatment?

Keywords: Clostridium; necrosis; treatment; tumor


Submitted Jan 30, 2015. Accepted for publication Feb 20, 2015.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.39


Cancer is a disease with a high incidence in the western world and worldwide cancer burden continues to increase. Although the use of standard treatment modalities results in ~50% cure of cancer patients, failure to control the tumor locally and metastasis result in lack of treatment efficacy in the other 50%. Conventional treatment is unsatisfactory for many patients bearing large non-resectable locally advanced tumors. To increase treatment potential, substantial resources must be devoted to discovery and development of novel anti-cancer therapies. When doing so, it is important to recognize both the factors that distinguish a tumor from its surrounding normal tissue as well as the factors that limit successful therapy with available treatments. Tumor hypoxia is a good example (1). The majority of solid tumors in patients have shown, irrespective of their size, to contain hypoxic and/or necrotic regions (2). This arises due to the chaotic organization and irregularity of blood vessels, which prevent sufficient delivery of oxygen, nutrients and therapeutic agents to all cells within the tumor (3). Furthermore, hypoxic tumor cells are more resistant to ionizing radiation and anti-proliferative drugs. A variety of therapeutic approaches have been designed to overcome this source of resistance. These primarily include strategies that aim to decrease hypoxia by increasing oxygen availability [e.g., high oxygen gas breathing (4)], or strategies aimed at preferentially killing this resistant cell population [e.g., by using bioreductive drugs (5)]. Alternatively, as hypoxia/necrosis is highly specific for tumors, it also represents a unique environment not found elsewhere in the body. Furthermore, tumor necrosis is not only commonly found in most solid cancers, it is also strongly associated with poor prognosis (6) and currently no therapeutic agents are available that “use” tumor necrosis to specifically target the tumor. Yet, this necrotic niche is the ideal environment for growth of strictly anaerobic bacteria. Although maybe rather out of the common at first sight, the deliberate administration of anaerobic bacteria in cancer has a longstanding history [for a review, see e.g., (7)]. Amongst the different species of prokaryotic species used for this purpose, the Clostridium genus has been most widely studied. Much of the current interest in Clostridium-mediated anti-cancer treatment originates from the initial studies of M. Brown and colleagues about two decades ago (8). As a group, Clostridium has probably achieved greatest prominence as a consequence of their more notorious representatives, such as C. botulinum or C. tetani. Although clostridia are strictly anaerobic, most of them can form spores allowing survival but not growth in oxic conditions. These spores only germinate into metabolically active cells when conditions are favorable (as in wounds or spoiled meat). Most members of the genus are, however, non-pathogenic. Moreover, and paradoxically, it is the very ability to form spores that presents this genus with its potential for treating cancer. In addition, the clostridia used in the field of cancer treatment are sensitive to a wide range of antibiotics, allowing tight control over their presence at all times.

In their paper, Roberts et al. (9) use C. novyi-NT, an attenuated derivative of the wild type strain by removal of the α-toxin gene. C. novyi-NT has been shown in preclinical settings to have excellent tumor colonizing properties. Also C. sporogenes (10) and C. perfringens (11) have been shown to possess this characteristic and it represents probably one of the most important strain-specific requirements if to be supplied to patients. Indeed, a tumor can only be taken down when sufficient artillery (active vegetative bacterial cells) can be activated at the crime scene (the hypoxic/necrotic tumor area). To increase the chance for successful application of their Clostridium-mediated anti-tumor approach, the authors choose for local intratumoral spore administration, arguing that low colonization might take place when administering the spores in large animals and human patients intravenously due to the relatively large blood volumes and relatively small tumors as compared to murine models. This is a valid argument, yet limits the applicability as only tumors amendable to percutaneous injection of spores can be included. Several alternatives exist to overcome this issue. One approach to significantly increase colonization efficiency may be to increase the level of necrosis in tumors by application of vascular targeting agents (12). Another approach is to increase the potency of the clostridial vector itself. Roberts et al. use non-armed C. novyi-NT bacteria, and it is the specific proteolytic nature of the strain that, once germinated, induces tumor necrosis. Strains such as C. sporogenes also have inherent anti-tumor effects as a consequence of proteolysis, but to a lesser extent, and significant efficacy improvement can be obtained by arming these bugs with additional therapeutic genes. The development of a method that allows stable integration of a foreign gene in the clostridial genome without the need for antibiotics, as described by Heap et al. (13) represented a major breakthrough in this context. It is now possible to integrate virtually any gene of interest within the chromosome, thereby minimizing risk of loss due to segregational instability or horizontal transfer when using autonomous plasmids. Obviously, for a clinical trial to be allowed when incorporating a foreign gene, stable integration is an absolute requirement from a regulatory point of view. In principle, any gene of choice can now be added to the clostridial vector. The wide potential is exemplified by the incorporation of even a single chain antibody into both C. novyi-NT and C. sporogenes (14), pointing towards possibilities for combining antibody- and clostridial based approaches in one and the same treatment. Most studies with armed clostridia have however been performed with so-called prodrug converting enzymes (PCE). Such PCE can convert a non-toxic prodrug into a chemotherapeutic agent. Since the PCE is only expressed within the tumor where clostridia reside, the conversion also only takes place locally within the tumor, thereby avoiding the side effects commonly occurring following systemic therapy. In addition, most of these prodrug/PCE combinations are characterized by a potent bystander effect as the converted prodrug can diffuse from the site of conversion towards non-exposed neighbouring cells within its vicinity. The proof-of-principle of this approach has been shown with PCE expressed from a plasmid (10,15) and more importantly, recently also with a nitroreductase PCE stably integrated into the chromosome (16). Clearly, clostridial-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (CDEPT) can thus create enormous efficacy amplification with the potential to overcome the limited efficacy of non-armed clostridia in case limited colonization should occur. Then again, the patient described in the paper has excellent colonization of the tumor although only 1×104 C. novyi-NT spores were administered, a dose several orders of magnitude lower than described in most preclinical studies, indicating that colonization in human tumors even when spores were to be administered systemically will not be a major obstacle for success.

The authors of this paper convincingly show the importance of using the appropriate models. They start with an orthotopically implanted syngeneic rat glioma, a very aggressive and most difficult to treat tumor. Response to bacterial treatment was remarkably fast and tumor-tissue specific and one spore administration resulted in significant survival advantage with medically manageable edema as mostly occurring side effect. Probably even more impressive are the data generated with spontaneous canine soft tissue carcinomas. These tumors not only resemble the histopathological features of human soft tissue carcinomas, the authors also extensively show that the genetic landscapes of these tumors in terms of numbers of genetic alterations and spectrum of mutations are similar. A large comparative study including 16 dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors receiving 1 to 4 cycles of bacterial spore treatment is described. Responses vary from progressive disease (no response) to complete response. Adverse events were in general mild and the majority of animals showed clinical signs of inflammatory response, providing clear evidence of an innate immune response and an indication of tumor colonization by the administered bacteria. Most dogs also developed abscess formation, probably a consequence of the rather aggressive tumor colonization and necrosis-inducing characteristics of C. novyi-NT. Although abscess formation was not always observed and also not necessarily linked to objective response, the requirement for surgical management and wound debridement does negatively influence the risk/benefit analysis and should be carefully looked after in future trials. Nevertheless, all together the described preclinical data in both rats and dogs are very promising and do warrant use of bacterial administration in humans. Treatment of one patient is described, and although of course way too early to draw any conclusion with regards to safety, tolerability or response rate, the observed response in this patient together with the manageable side effects show great promise for what yet has to come. For sure, the combination especially with proper selection and highly specific local treatments such as radiotherapy can be expected to increase efficacy further. In that respect, recent technical developments now allow highly precise radiation treatment planning also in animals through the use of dedicated innovative small animal radiation machines making appropriate preclinical testing of such combinations in relevant preclinical models possible (17).

In summary, Roberts et al. have provided very promising data on the use of Clostridium to join the fight in the battle against cancer. Other options along this line, including proper patient selection with imaging (18), systemic injection of spores and different Clostridium strains armed with therapeutic genes are also on the way (16). With these promising data and with many of the obstacles related to this novel and rather uncommon approach being solved over the last years, we believe that the uncomfortable feeling that might exist in patients’ and medical doctors’ heads when deliberately administering bacteria may disappear. As more patients will be evaluated in future trials and as various approaches with different strains will be tested, we are hopeful that the full potential of Clostridium-mediated anti-cancer treatment will become clear and that much more than a dream, this treatment will become reality.


Acknowledgements

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.


References

  1. Wouters BG, Koritzinsky M, Chiu RK, et al. Modulation of cell death in the tumor microenvironment. Semin Radiat Oncol 2003;13:31-41. [PubMed]
  2. Pettersen EO, Ebbesen P, Gieling RG, et al. Targeting tumour hypoxia to prevent cancer metastasis. From biology, biosensing and technology to drug development: the METOXIA consortium. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2014;1-33. [PubMed]
  3. Peeters SG, Zegers CM, Lieuwes NG, et al. A Comparative Study of the Hypoxia PET Tracers [(18)F]HX4, [(18)F]FAZA, and [(18)F]FMISO in a Preclinical Tumor Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015;91:351-9. [PubMed]
  4. Janssens GO, Rademakers SE, Terhaard CH, et al. Accelerated radiotherapy with carbogen and nicotinamide for laryngeal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1777-83. [PubMed]
  5. DiSilvestro PA, Ali S, Craighead PS, et al. Phase III randomized trial of weekly cisplatin and irradiation versus cisplatin and tirapazamine and irradiation in stages IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB, and IVA cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:458-64. [PubMed]
  6. Pollheimer MJ, Kornprat P, Lindtner RA, et al. Tumor necrosis is a new promising prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol 2010;41:1749-57. [PubMed]
  7. Mengesha A, Dubois L, Chiu RK, et al. Potential and limitations of bacterial-mediated cancer therapy. Front Biosci 2007;12:3880-91. [PubMed]
  8. Minton NP, Mauchline ML, Lemmon MJ, et al. Chemotherapeutic tumour targeting using clostridial spores. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1995;17:357-64. [PubMed]
  9. Roberts NJ, Zhang L, Janku F, et al. Intratumoral injection of Clostridium novyi-NT spores induces antitumor responses. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:249ra111.
  10. Theys J, Pennington O, Dubois L, et al. Repeated cycles of Clostridium-directed enzyme prodrug therapy result in sustained antitumour effects in vivo. Br J Cancer 2006;95:1212-9. [PubMed]
  11. Li Z, Fallon J, Mandeli J, et al. A genetically enhanced anaerobic bacterium for oncopathic therapy of pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1389-400. [PubMed]
  12. Theys J, Landuyt W, Nuyts S, et al. Improvement of Clostridium tumour targeting vectors evaluated in rat rhabdomyosarcomas. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2001;30:37-41. [PubMed]
  13. Heap JT, Ehsaan M, Cooksley CM, et al. Integration of DNA into bacterial chromosomes from plasmids without a counter-selection marker. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:e59. [PubMed]
  14. Groot AJ, Mengesha A, van der Wall E, et al. Functional antibodies produced by oncolytic clostridia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;364:985-9. [PubMed]
  15. Liu SC, Ahn GO, Kioi M, et al. Optimized clostridium-directed enzyme prodrug therapy improves the antitumor activity of the novel DNA cross-linking agent PR-104. Cancer Res 2008;68:7995-8003. [PubMed]
  16. Heap JT, Theys J, Ehsaan M, et al. Spores of Clostridium engineered for clinical efficacy and safety cause regression and cure of tumors in vivo. Oncotarget 2014;5:1761-9. [PubMed]
  17. Butterworth KT, Prise KM, Verhaegen F. Small animal image-guided radiotherapy: status, considerations and potential for translational impact. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140634. [PubMed]
  18. Zegers CM, van Elmpt W, Wierts R, et al. Hypoxia imaging with [18F]HX4 PET in NSCLC patients: defining optimal imaging parameters. Radiother Oncol 2013;109:58-64. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Theys J, Lambin P. Clostridium to treat cancer: dream or reality? Ann Transl Med 2015;3(S1):S21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.39