The role of circulating microRNAs in acute coronary syndromes: ready for prime time?
Commentary

The role of circulating microRNAs in acute coronary syndromes: ready for prime time?

Gert Klug, Bernhard Metzler

Cardiology and Angiology, University Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Correspondence to: Gert Klug. Cardiology and Angiology, University Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Email: Gert.Klug@tirol-kliniken.at.

Provenance: This is a Guest Commentary commissioned by Section Editor Zhijun Han, MD (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wuxi Second Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China).

Comment on: Navickas R, Gal D, Laucevičius A, et al. Identifying circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Res 2016;111:322-37.


Submitted Oct 18, 2016. Accepted for publication Oct 24, 2016.

doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.64


Recently Navickas et al. published a review on the role of microRNAs (miRs) as biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in Cardiovascular Research (1). Based on a systematic literature research their aim was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of miRs in healthy subjects, subjects with stable coronary artery disease and patients with different forms of unstable coronary artery disease (unstable angina, non-STEMI and STEMI). They identified n=487 papers and extracted n=19 studies, reporting on 52 different miRs, after a rigorous quality check. The largest amount of evidence, through all stages of cardiovascular disease, was found for miR-133a/b (5 studies), miR-208a/b (6 studies) and miR-499 (7 studies). Furthermore the promising role of miR-1 (3 studies) in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes and the regulation of miR-145 in STEMI patients is highlighted. A meta-analysis, however, is not presented because of heterogeneous study designs and analytical reasons (1).

Especially in patients with acute coronary syndromes the role of novel biomarkers is rapidly evolving (2). Cardiac troponin measured with standard (3) and high-sensitive (4) assays has improved our abilities to define patients with acute coronary syndromes (5), estimate the amount of myocardial necrosis (3), predict functional impairment (6,7) and prognosis (8). Another well-established biomarker in acute coronary syndromes is NT-pro-BNP (9). Today these two biomarkers impact clinical decisions of cardiologist every day. However their diagnostic performance is hampered by diagnostic windows, their relatively low specificity (10) and their correlation with renal function (11). Therefor there is indeed a need to identify novel biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes.

miR-1 is very specific for cardiac skeletal muscle and plays an important role during cardiogenesis and proliferation of cardiomyocytes (12). Three different studies, with a total of n=583 patients with acute coronary syndromes and n=259 controls (13-15), investigated the role of miR-1 in the initial diagnosis of patients with chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndrome. Wang et al. observed that miR-1 levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction are elevated compared to controls, but the diagnostic performance of miR-1 was inferior to cardiac troponin I (AUC: 0.85 vs. 0.99) (13). Oerlemans et al. described an increase in miR-1 even in patients with initially negative troponin levels or in patients presenting within 3 hours after symptom onset (14). Furthermore, Widera et al. showed that miR-1 levels are significantly higher in patients with NSTEMI or STEMI than in patients with unstable angina, although they did not predict mortality at 6 months (15). Anyhow, these results identify miR-1 as one of the most promising miRs for the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes, especially in the combination with other biomarkers.

The largest study included in this review was performed by Devaux et al. (16). It prospectively investigated the use of six different miRs in n=1,155 patients with acute chest pain and suspected acute myocardial infarction. Finally, n=179 patients were diagnosed as NSTEMI and n=45 patients as suffering from a STEMI. miR-133a, miR-208b and miR-499 were identified as univariate predictors of myocardial infarction. As noted by Navickas et al. all these three miRs control cardiomyocyte identity (17). However, their predictive value did not remain significant after correction for troponin levels. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating curves were low (AUC: 0.53–0.76) compared to high sensitive troponin (AUC: 0.94). The miR-133a, miR-208b and miR-499 levels were significantly higher in STEMI patients than in NSTEMI patients (16). These findings are in line with the findings of Widera et al. on miR-133a and miR-208a (15), although both studies failed to demonstrate an independent prognostic value of all miRs studied.

The potential unique role of miR-133a in STEMI patients is further highlighted by a study by Eitel et al. (18). In this study miR-133a levels were associated with decreased myocardial salvage, larger infarct size and microvascular obstruction (19) as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance in a clearly defined study population of n=216 consecutive STEMI patients. Although miR-133a was a univariate predictor of mortality and MACE (HR: 1.28) the use of cardiac magnetic resonance for infarct characterisation (20) allowed the authors to demonstrate, that this association is not independent of infarct characteristics (18).

Another study focusing exclusively on patients with STEMI was performed by Dong et al. (21) who investigated the prognostic value of miR-145, which regulates vascular smooth muscle cell and cardiomyocyte differentiation and has been shown to correlate with infarct size (22). In n=245 with STEMI they demonstrated that miR-145 levels above the median predicted 12-months MACE independent of NT-pro-BNP, creatine kinase or troponin levels (HR: 5.6) (21). Interestingly miR-145 levels have been observed to be generally lower in patients with severe coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes which might indicate altered expression of miR-145 in these patients (23). As these findings seem controversial further research should clarify the role of miR-145 in cardiovascular disease.

Navickas et al. have done a valuable work in identifying five, out of more than 2,000 described in humans, miRs which have great potential to improve our daily clinical work in the future. Their review is based on the data of 19 studies with more than 6,000 participants (1). These miRs are ready for prime time in cardiovascular research but further studies are warranted to provide reliable and standardised quantification with faster PCR and microarray technologies. Then it should be possible to include these promising biomarkers in controlled, large-scale, well-powered trials and, perhaps someday, into clinical practice.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Navickas R, Gal D, Laucevičius A, et al. Identifying circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Res 2016;111:322-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Reinstadler SJ, Feistritzer HJ, Reindl M, et al. Combined biomarker testing for the prediction of left ventricular remodelling in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Open Heart 2016;3:e000485. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Klug G, Mayr A, Mair J, et al. Role of biomarkers in assessment of early infarct size after successful p-PCI for STEMI. Clin Res Cardiol 2011;100:501-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Reinstadler SJ, Feistritzer HJ, Klug G, et al. High-sensitivity troponin T for prediction of left ventricular function and infarct size one year following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2016;202:188-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Glob Heart 2012;7:275-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Mayr A, Mair J, Klug G, et al. Cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase predict mid-term infarct size and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction: a cardiac MR study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:847-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Feistritzer HJ, Klug G, Reinstadler SJ, et al. Novel biomarkers predicting cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction. Br Med Bull 2016;119:63-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Sherwood MW, Morrow DA, Scirica BM, et al. Early dynamic risk stratification with baseline troponin levels and 90-minute ST-segment resolution to predict 30-day cardiovascular mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from CLopidogrel as Adjunctive ReperfusIon TherapY (CLARITY)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 28. Am Heart J 2010;159:964-971.e1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Mayr A, Mair J, Schocke M, et al. Predictive value of NT-pro BNP after acute myocardial infarction: relation with acute and chronic infarct size and myocardial function. Int J Cardiol 2011;147:118-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Haaf P, Drexler B, Reichlin T, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin in the distinction of acute myocardial infarction from acute cardiac noncoronary artery disease. Circulation 2012;126:31-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Reinstadler SJ, Klug G, Feistritzer HJ, et al. Copeptin testing in acute myocardial infarction: ready for routine use? Dis Markers 2015;2015:614145.
  12. Zhao Y, Samal E, Srivastava D. Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis. Nature 2005;436:214-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Wang GK, Zhu JQ, Zhang JT, et al. Circulating microRNA: a novel potential biomarker for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in humans. Eur Heart J 2010;31:659-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Oerlemans MI, Mosterd A, Dekker MS, et al. Early assessment of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: the potential diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs. EMBO Mol Med 2012;4:1176-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Widera C, Gupta SK, Lorenzen JM, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of six circulating microRNAs in acute coronary syndrome. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2011;51:872-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Devaux Y, Mueller M, Haaf P, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating microRNAs in patients with acute chest pain. J Intern Med 2015;277:260-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Xin M, Olson EN, Bassel-Duby R. Mending broken hearts: cardiac development as a basis for adult heart regeneration and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013;14:529-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Eitel I, Adams V, Dieterich P, et al. Relation of circulating MicroRNA-133a concentrations with myocardial damage and clinical prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2012;164:706-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Klug G, Mayr A, Schenk S, et al. Prognostic value at 5 years of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Klug G, Metzler B. Assessing myocardial recovery following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: short- and long-term perspectives using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013;11:203-19. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Dong YM, Liu XX, Wei GQ, et al. Prediction of long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction using circulating miR-145. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2015;75:85-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Meder B, Keller A, Vogel B, et al. MicroRNA signatures in total peripheral blood as novel biomarkers for acute myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 2011;106:13-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Gao H, Guddeti RR, Matsuzawa Y, et al. Plasma Levels of microRNA-145 Are Associated with Severity of Coronary Artery Disease. PLoS One 2015;10:e0123477. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Klug G, Metzler B. The role of circulating microRNAs in acute coronary syndromes: ready for prime time? Ann Transl Med 2016;4(24):537. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.64

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.