Can respiratory hyperoxia mitigate adenosine—driven suppression of antitumor immunity?
Editorial

Can respiratory hyperoxia mitigate adenosine—driven suppression of antitumor immunity?

Peter Vaupel, Arnulf Mayer

Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Tumor Pathophysiology Section, University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany

Correspondence to: Prof. Dr. med. Peter Vaupel. Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. Email: vaupel@uni-mainz.de.

Submitted Aug 25, 2015. Accepted for publication Aug 28, 2015.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.09.23


Introduction

Presence of hypoxic sub-volumes, extracellular acidosis, and the accumulation of extracellular adenosine (ADO) and lactate are pathophysiological traits in most human solid tumors (1-3). As a consequence of these properties, tumor cells switch to (mal-)adaptive processes and develop aggressive phenotypes and resistance to treatment [e.g., (4-7)]. In a recent review article, a synopsis was presented of the various mechanisms by which tumor hypoxia per se and through indirect actions may contribute to a more aggressive phenotype, to an increased resistance to anticancer therapies, and finally to poor patient outcome (6). In this context it has been outlined that hypoxia-associated ADO-accumulation may be one of the central drivers for the inhibition of anticancer immune response.

There is abundant evidence that the antitumor activities of cytotoxic lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and dendritic cells (DCs) are inhibited in hypoxic tumor microenvironments (TMEs), whereas functions of immune-suppressive cells (Treg cells, tumor-associated M2-macrophages, myeloid derived suppressor cells MDSCs) and immune-suppressive cytokines (e.g., TGF-β, IL-10) are promoted.

Extracellular acidosis in solid tumors also negatively affects cellular and humoral antitumor functions (8,9). Likewise, lactate accumulation can exert a strong inhibitory effect on the antitumor immune-response (10-12).

ADO-rich TMEs are mostly caused by catabolism of extracellular nucleotides (ATP, ADP, AMP) by hypoxia-/HIF-1-sensitive, membrane-associated CD39/CD73-ectoenzymes and signaling through A2A-receptors (13-21). Most probably, extracellular generation is the major source of ADO in the halo of cancer cells upon specific alterations taking place during tumor growth. Intracellular ADO-formation from AMP by a cytosolic AMP-nucleotidase with subsequent ADO-export into the extracellular space through a nucleoside transporter (ENT-1) seems to play a subordinate role.


ADO levels and ADO-receptors in solid malignancies

Extracellular ADO-concentrations in normal tissues have been found to be in the range of 10-100 nM (21,22). In contrast, levels in experimental tumors were reported to be in the µM-range (2,23). In a recent publication, intratumoral ADO levels in severely hypoxic, “high-adenosine” MCA205 fibrosarcomas were in the range of 0.2 to 1.3 µM (21). This level (average: 0.8 µM) was approx. 30 times higher than in the skin overlaying the tumor. These data clearly indicate that tumors—in contrast to normal tissues—accumulate ADO in concentrations high enough to even stimulate the “low-affinity” receptor A2B.

In general, all ADO receptor subtypes A1, A2A, A2B and A3 were found to be up-regulated in various tumor cell lines. Observations concerning the modulation of cancer growth upon activation of A1 receptors are still conflicting (24). A2A-, A2B- and A3- receptors have been implicated in tumor angiogenesis via secretion of pro-angiogenic VEGF, bFGF, angiopoietin-2 and IL-8 (15,24). Notably, A2A-receptors are preferentially involved in the inhibition of the antitumor immune function.


Adenosinergic tumor immune evasion by inhibition of immune cell functions

The seminal observations of Hoskin et al. (23,25) have established a role for ADO in the tumor escape from immune control through blocking antitumor immunity. The function of the A2A-receptor in the adenosinergic inhibition of the antitumor immune action was clearly documented by Ohta and Sitkovsky (26). At present, there is strong evidence that adenosinergic signaling, preferentially through A2A-receptors, in hypoxic, ADO-rich TMEs can lead to a broad spectrum of strong immune-suppressive properties facilitating tumor escape from immune control. These mechanisms include: (I) impaired activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, of DCs and of cytotoxic NK cells; and (II) activation of Treg cells and expansion of MDSCs, promotion of pro-tumor M2-macrophages and increased activity of the immune-suppressive cytokines TGF-β and IL-10, which directly inhibit T-cell function and promote induction of Treg cells.


Respiratory hyperoxia weakens the hypoxia-driven adenosinergic inhibition of antitumor immune response

Based on the hypoxia-adenosinergic pathway (hypoxia → activation of HIF-1 and CD39/CD73 → ADO accumulation → A2A-receptor stimulation → G-protein-and cAMP-mediated, multifaceted immunosuppression), Hatfield et al. (21) have initiated a proof-of-principle study to test whether respiratory hyperoxia (60% O2) can decrease ADO-levels in the TME in order to improve the antitumor immune response. They could demonstrate that breathing this hyperoxic gas mixture can substantially decrease extracellular ADO levels in severely hypoxic, high-adenosine MCA205 mouse fibrosarcomas by about 75% (estimated from data presented in Figure S5). This drop of the ADO level was the result of a downregulation of hypoxia- and HIF-1α-related genes, including the expression of the ADO-generating CD39/CD73-ectoenzymes, and of COX-2. As a consequence, immune-suppression was “revived”, tumor angiogenesis was reduced and the activity of tumor-antigen-expressing molecules was increased, and finally tumor growth was delayed and long-term survival of mice was achieved. These data confirmed the original assumption of the authors that improvement in the tumor oxygenation status can convert the TME from tumor-protecting to tumor-destructing by restoration of the key components of the innate and adaptive immune system involved in antitumor cytotoxicity (e.g., de-inhibition of NK cells and antitumor T-cells). Of note, hyperoxic gas breathing has also been shown to improve clinical outcome of hypoxic tumors treated with accelerated radiotherapy (27).

Hatfield and colleagues have now substantially extended their experiments adding another tumor model and expanding their spectrum of experimental techniques (28). In addition to confirming their earlier observations, they now expand our knowledge with the following key results: (I) inhibition of T-lymphocytes and NK cells is the principle mechanism for anticancer immune-suppression in hypoxic, ADO-rich tumors, triggered by CD39/CD73- and A2A-receptor activation, and cAMP signaling; (II) respiratory hyperoxia promotes tumor regression, decreases lung metastases of experimental breast cancers and prolongs long-term survival in the preclinical setting due to enhancement of tumor infiltration by antitumor CD8+-T-cells; (III) these latter effects are independent of ROS-generation upon respiratory hyperoxia, instead they are entirely established by reactive T-and NK-cells; (IV) severely hypoxic tumor regions show markedly fewer infiltration of antitumor CD4+-and CD8+-cells, thus demonstrating “aversion to hypoxia”; (V) respiratory hyperoxia improves tumor regression in preclinical tumor models of immunotherapies; (VI) expression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) was reduced upon hyperoxic treatment and, perhaps clinically most relevant, rejection of lung metastases following combined CTLA-4 and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade was significantly enhanced by additional inspiratory hyperoxia.


Other mechanisms potentially involved in the reversal of immunosuppressive reactions upon respiratory hyperoxia

From earlier in-vivo-studies on experimental tumors there is clear indication that other mechanisms may also be involved in the “rescue” of anticancer immune response using respiratory hyperoxia, especially when considering that normobaric respiratory hyperoxia as used by Hatfield et al. (28) can reduce tumor hypoxia only to a limited extent, instead of totally eradicating the O2-deficiency status (29,30).

Upon respiration of a gas mixture containing 60% O2 under normobaric conditions, arterial pO2-values of approx. 350 mmHg will be reached. Under these conditions, only an incomplete improvement in O2 fluxes can occur that is probably not able to eradicate severe tumor hypoxia in all malignancies, especially human malignancies and considering the multicausal pathogenesis of this condition (31,32). Particularly, abrogation of tissue hypoxia at the venous end of tumor microvessels is unlikely upon respiratory hyperoxia using 60% O2 (33,34). This notion is supported by data presented in Figure 1A (right panel) of the previous paper by Hatfield et al. (21), which indicates that there still is significant Hypoxyprobe staining upon breathing of 60% O2.

Other mechanisms possibly involved in the effects now observed by Hatfield et al. (28) may include a switch from glycolytic breakdown to a more oxidative metabolism of glucose resulting in a reduced production of lactic acid [−25% (34)] and of protons (H+-ions), thus significantly attenuating tumor tissue acidosis. Both conditions, accumulation of lactate and acidosis, are known to reduce antitumor immune-suppression, as already mentioned in the Introduction section. Breathing of 60% O2 may also reduce intracellular ATP hydrolysis through stabilization of the bioenergetic status of cancer cells. As a consequence, production of ADO and protons is reduced. These additional mechanisms upon respiratory hyperoxia may support the anti-adenosinergic processes profoundly discussed by Hatfield et al. (28).


Conclusions

With their article, Hatfield et al. (28) have significantly expanded current knowledge about the role of ADO as a potent inhibitor of (anticancer) immune-responses, an action that is far beyond its well-known protective functions on the heart, brain and kidneys, in pain management and as an inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Indeed, their novel data have established ADO as a candidate central player of immune suppression mediated by the TME. For their actual research and notable publication Hatfield and colleagues should be highly commended.

Their finding that respiratory hyperoxia reverses the hypoxia-associated adenosinergic immune-escape of malignant tumors is of utmost importance as a rationale for testing supplemental oxygen as a co-adjuvant, either alone or together with already available selective A2A-receptor antagonists and/or CD39/CD73-inhibitors, with existing anticancer immunotherapies. Clinicians should be aware of the fact, that respiratory hyperoxia using 60% O2 might not be able to completely eradicate all severely hypoxic tumor sub-volumes under normobaric conditions in solid human tumors. Nevertheless, applying respiratory hyperoxia, an easily applicable and thus routinely feasible physical measure, may increase the efficacy of anticancer immune checkpoint therapy (CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition) in the clinical setting. Further synergies may arise from the well-established effect of hyperoxic gas breathing during fractionated radiotherapy of hypoxic tumors.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Provenance: This is a Guest Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Hui Kong, MD. Ph.D (Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China).

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Vaupel P. Tumor microenvironmental physiology and its implications for radiation oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol 2004;14:198-206. [PubMed]
  2. Busse M, Vaupel P. Accumulation of purine catabolites in solid tumors exposed to therapeutic hyperthermia. Experientia 1996;52:469-73. [PubMed]
  3. Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res 1989;49:6449-65. [PubMed]
  4. Vaupel P, Mayer A, Höckel M. Tumor hypoxia and malignant progression. Methods Enzymol 2004;381:335-54. [PubMed]
  5. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2007;26:225-39. [PubMed]
  6. Mayer A, Vaupel P. Hypoxia, lactate accumulation, and acidosis: siblings or accomplices driving tumor progression and resistance to therapy? Adv Exp Med Biol 2013;789:203-9. [PubMed]
  7. Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2012;33:207-14. [PubMed]
  8. Lardner A. The effects of extracellular pH on immune function. J Leukoc Biol 2001;69:522-30. [PubMed]
  9. Gottfried E, Kreutz M, Mackensen A. Tumor metabolism as modulator of immune response and tumor progression. Semin Cancer Biol 2012;22:335-41. [PubMed]
  10. Choi SY, Collins CC, Gout PW, et al. Cancer-generated lactic acid: a regulatory, immunosuppressive metabolite? J Pathol 2013;230:350-5. [PubMed]
  11. Mendler AN, Hu B, Prinz PU, et al. Tumor lactic acidosis suppresses CTL function by inhibition of p38 and JNK/c-Jun activation. Int J Cancer 2012;131:633-40. [PubMed]
  12. Marchiq I, Pouysségur J. Hypoxia, cancer metabolism and the therapeutic benefit of targeting lactate/H+ symporters. J Mol Med (Berl) 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
  13. Ohta A, Gorelik E, Prasad SJ, et al. A2A adenosine receptor protects tumors from antitumor T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:13132-7. [PubMed]
  14. Sitkovsky MV. T regulatory cells: hypoxia-adenosinergic suppression and re-direction of the immune response. Trends Immunol 2009;30:102-8. [PubMed]
  15. Gessi S, Merighi S, Sacchetto V, et al. Adenosine receptors and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1808:1400-12.
  16. Spychala J. Tumor-promoting functions of adenosine. Pharmacol Ther 2000;87:161-73. [PubMed]
  17. Ghiringhelli F, Bruchard M, Chalmin F, et al. Production of adenosine by ectonucleotidases: a key factor in tumor immunoescape. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012;2012:473712.
  18. Di Virgilio F. Purines, purinergic receptors, and cancer. Cancer Res 2012;72:5441-7. [PubMed]
  19. Muller-Haegele S, Muller L, Whiteside TL. Immunoregulatory activity of adenosine and its role in human cancer progression. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014;10:897-914. [PubMed]
  20. Antonioli L, Blandizzi C, Pacher P, et al. Immunity, inflammation and cancer: a leading role for adenosine. Nat Rev Cancer 2013;13:842-57. [PubMed]
  21. Hatfield SM, Kjaergaard J, Lukashev D, et al. Systemic oxygenation weakens the hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factor 1α-dependent and extracellular adenosine-mediated tumor protection. J Mol Med (Berl) 2014;92:1283-92. [PubMed]
  22. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia-driven adenosine accumulation: a crucial microenvironmental factor promoting tumor progression. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015. In press.
  23. Blay J, White TD, Hoskin DW. The extracellular fluid of solid carcinomas contains immunosuppressive concentrations of adenosine. Cancer Res 1997;57:2602-5. [PubMed]
  24. Fishman P, Bar-Yehuda S, Synowitz M, et al. Adenosine receptors and cancer. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2009;(193):399-441.
  25. Hoskin DW, Reynolds T, Blay J. Adenosine as a possible inhibitor of killer T-cell activation in the microenvironment of solid tumours. Int J Cancer 1994;59:854-5. [PubMed]
  26. Ohta A, Sitkovsky M. Role of G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors in downregulation of inflammation and protection from tissue damage. Nature 2001;414:916-20. [PubMed]
  27. Janssens GO, Rademakers SE, Terhaard CH, et al. Accelerated radiotherapy with carbogen and nicotinamide for laryngeal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1777-83. [PubMed]
  28. Hatfield SM, Kjaergaard J, Lukashev D, et al. Immunological mechanisms of the antitumor effects of supplemental oxygenation. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:277ra30.
  29. Vaupel P, Manz R, Müller-Klieser W, et al. Intracapillary HbO2 saturation in malignant tumors during normoxia and hyperoxia. Microvasc Res 1979;17:181-91. [PubMed]
  30. Thews O, Vaupel P. Spatial oxygenation profiles in tumors during normo- and hyperbaric hyperoxia. Strahlenther Onkol 2015;191:875-82. [PubMed]
  31. Bayer C, Shi K, Astner ST, et al. Acute versus chronic hypoxia: why a simplified classification is simply not enough. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:965-8. [PubMed]
  32. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in tumors: pathogenesis-related classification, characterization of hypoxia subtypes, and associated biological and clinical implications. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014;812:19-24. [PubMed]
  33. Vaupel P. Hypoxia in neoplastic tissue. Microvasc Res 1977;13:399-408. [PubMed]
  34. Vaupel P. Atemgaswechsel und Glucosestoffwechsel von Implantationstumoren (DS-Carcinosarkom) in vivo: experimentelle Untersuchungen und theoretische Analysen zur Frage der kritischen Sauerstoff- und Glucoseversorgung im Tumorgewebe. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag, 1974.
Cite this article as: Vaupel P, Mayer A. Can respiratory hyperoxia mitigate adenosine—driven suppression of antitumor immunity? Ann Transl Med 2015;3(19):292. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.09.23