@article{ATM27445,
author = {Issa Pour-Ghaz and Theodore Manolukas and Nathalie Foray and Joel Raja and Aranyak Rawal and Uzoma N. Ibebuogu and Rami N. Khouzam},
title = {Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?},
journal = {Annals of Translational Medicine},
volume = {7},
number = {17},
year = {2019},
keywords = {},
abstract = {One of the most important variables in assessing hemodynamic status in the intensive care unit (ICU) is the cardiac function and blood pressure. Invasive methods such as pulmonary artery catheter and arterial line allow monitoring of blood pressure and cardiac function accurately and reliably. However, their use is not without drawbacks, especially when the invasive nature of these procedures and complications associated with them are considered. There are several newer methods of noninvasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring available. In this manuscript, we will review these different methods of minimally invasive and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and will discuss their advantages, drawbacks and limitations.},
issn = {2305-5847}, url = {https://atm.amegroups.org/article/view/27445}
}