How to cite item

A deep learning system for identifying lattice degeneration and retinal breaks using ultra-widefield fundus images

  
@article{ATM32004,
	author = {Zhongwen Li and Chong Guo and Danyao Nie and Duoru Lin and Yi Zhu and Chuan Chen and Li Zhang and Fabao Xu and Chenjin Jin and Xiayin Zhang and Hui Xiao and Kai Zhang and Lanqin Zhao and Shanshan Yu and Guoming Zhang and Jiantao Wang and Haotian Lin},
	title = {A deep learning system for identifying lattice degeneration and retinal breaks using ultra-widefield fundus images},
	journal = {Annals of Translational Medicine},
	volume = {7},
	number = {22},
	year = {2019},
	keywords = {},
	abstract = {Background: Lattice degeneration and/or retinal breaks, defined as notable peripheral retinal lesions (NPRLs), are prone to evolving into rhegmatogenous retinal detachment which can cause severe visual loss. However, screening NPRLs is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Therefore, we aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) system for automated identifying NPRLs based on ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images.
Methods: A total of 5,606 UWF images from 2,566 participants were used to train and verify a DL system. All images were classified by 3 experienced ophthalmologists. The reference standard was determined when an agreement was achieved among all 3 ophthalmologists, or adjudicated by another retinal specialist if disagreements existed. An independent test set of 750 images was applied to verify the performance of 12 DL models trained using 4 different DL algorithms (InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and VGG16) with 3 preprocessing techniques (original, augmented, and histogram-equalized images). Heatmaps were generated to visualize the process of the best DL system in the identification of NPRLs.
Results: In the test set, the best DL system for identifying NPRLs achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999 with a sensitivity and specificity of 98.7% and 99.2%, respectively. The best preprocessing method in each algorithm was the application of original image augmentation (average AUC =0.996). The best algorithm in each preprocessing method was InceptionResNetV2 (average AUC =0.996). In the test set, 150 of 154 true-positive cases (97.4%) displayed heatmap visualization in the NPRL regions.
Conclusions: A DL system has high accuracy in identifying NPRLs based on UWF images. This system may help to prevent the development of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment by early detection of NPRLs.},
	issn = {2305-5847},	url = {http://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/32004}
}