Defensin-chemokine heteromeric complexes derived from heterocellular activation—a possible target to inhibit CCL5 in cardiovascular settings
Editorial

Defensin-chemokine heteromeric complexes derived from heterocellular activation—a possible target to inhibit CCL5 in cardiovascular settings

Osamu Baba1, Yongjian Liu2, Gwendalyn J. Randolph1

1Department of Pathology and Immunology, 2Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

Correspondence to: Gwendalyn J. Randolph, PhD. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8118, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. Email: grandolph@path.wustl.edu.

Provenance: This is a Guest Editorial commissioned by Section Editor Zhaohui Huang, MD (Wuxi Oncology institute, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China).

Comment on: Alard JE, Ortega-Gomez A, Wichapong K, et al. Recruitment of classical monocytes can be inhibited by disturbing heteromers of neutrophil HNP1 and platelet CCL5. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:317ra196.


Submitted Oct 11, 2016. Accepted for publication Oct 17, 2016.

doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.46


Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of death all over the world even after several medical technologies such as revascularization therapy including catheter intervention and surgery, and drug treatment have been developed. Among them, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is caused by sudden occlusion of coronary arteries induced by atherosclerotic plaque rapture or vasospasm. Consequently, cardiomyocytes downstream of the culprit site are exposed to hypoxia and eventually die, which induces acute pump failure, fatal arrhythmia, acute valvular dysfunction, cardiac rupture and so on. Even after surviving this acute period, pathological cardiac remodeling changes left ventricular size, mass and function, and leads to several chronic complications such as heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia, which finally increases the mortality. Therefore, development of new treatment strategy for this life-threatening disease is required.

Hypoxia due to marked reduction of blood supply impairs barrier function of endothelial cells. As a result, vessel permeability is enhanced and leukocyte infiltration through vessel walls is subsequently augmented (1,2). Injured or dead cells and damaged extracellular matrix due to prolonged hypoxia release danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which activate innate immune system to release inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, chemokines and adhesive molecules via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including toll-like receptors (TLRs) and subsequently recruit immune cells into the infarcted site (2,3). DAMPs also activate the complement cascade which induces further chemotaxis (2,4). Recovery of blood flow during this period induces reperfusion injury because the sudden supply of oxygen in this scenario with excess succinate released by damaged cells allows the reverse flow of electrons through complex II of the electron transport chain, succinate dehydrogenase, such that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated in excess (5). This ROS production amplifies tissue damage and additional activation of the complement pathway (1,2).

When blood supply to the tissue is markedly reduced, neutrophils are initially recruited into the ischemic zone. They release proteolytic enzymes and more ROS to perpetuate local cytotoxicity. They also secrete further inflammatory mediators and induce subsequent monocyte migration into the ischemic site (2,3,6,7). Humans and mice have at least two monocyte subsets. One is the classical inflammatory monocyte which is typically identified as CD14+CD16 monocyte in humans and as Ly6Chigh monocytes in mice (which like human monocytes are CD14+CD16 (8). The other subset is the non-classical inflammatory monocyte, which is typically identified as CD14lowCD16+ in humans and Ly6Clow monocyte in mice (9). These human and mouse monocyte subsets have gene expression similarities (8,10). After coronary ligation of mice, classical monocytes are recruited to the infarcted site and perform proteolytic and inflammatory activity initially. When healing goes well, these monocytes differentiate into cells that at least transiently resemble non-classical monocytes that in turn become repair-promoting macrophages (11,12). In skeletal muscle injury, blockade of monocyte recruitment prevents effective healing (11). Often, however, recruited monocytes develop detrimental phenotypes, particularly when their recruitment leads to the replacement of cardiac resident macrophages which have inherent regenerative potential (13). In this case, inhibition of monocyte recruitment preserves the population of these resident macrophages and attenuates cardiomyocyte injury in mice (13) and chronic heart failure (14).

Chemokines are a group of chemotactic heparin-binding cytokines. Many chemokines like CCL2, which attracts CCR2-expressing classical monocytes, are released from the infarcted site and play a critical role in disease processes. Among the many chemokines characterized is CCL5 (also known as RANTES: regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted). CCL5 recruits monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes through binding to multiple chemokine receptors, CCR1, CCR3 and CCR5. Blocking CCL5 with a neutralizing monoclonal antibody attenuates neutrophil and macrophage infiltration in the ischemic site and improves survival and cardiac function after coronary ligation in mice (15). However, Ccl5−/− mice show a decrease in antigen-specific T cell proliferation and production of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and IL-2 by T cells (16), and are immune compromised due to delayed viral clearance (17). Therefore, direct inhibition of CCL5 in a therapeutic setting may have an adverse effect on immune response against pathogen infection. Moreover, CCL5 is reported to be required for ischemia-induced angiogenesis (18), which can limit the healing effect of CCL5 inhibiting therapy. Thus, if it were possible to selectively affect certain activities of CCL5, therapeutic potential of targeting the role of CCL5 in cardiovascular disease would be greater.

A recent paper by Alard et al. raises such a possible, more selective approach (19). The authors noted that CCL5 secreted from platelets and human neutrophil peptide 1 (HNP1, α-defensin) derived from neutrophils form heteromers to enhance classical inflammatory monocyte adhesion and recruitment to cultured endothelial cells via CCR5. Neither CCL5 nor HNP1 alone is sufficient to augment monocyte recruitment and adhesion. Thus, the activation of different cellular players, platelets and neutrophils, during inflammation might lead to the formation of a defensin-chemokine complex, pointing to a high level regulatory process that might keep monocyte recruitment in check unless multiple activation checkpoints are crossed. Activated platelets aggregate during ischemia and reperfusion, augment tissue injury by releasing platelet-derived mediators and are transported to the inflammatory site by polymorphonuclear leukocytes (1,20). It has been known that platelets can release CCL5 (21). HNP1 belongs to the α-defensin family and is contained within azurophilic granules of neutrophils with other HNPs (HNP 2−4). When these granules fuse with phagosomes, HNPs are thought to be released to pathogen or phagocytic surfaces and cause disruption of microbial membrane to kill bacteria (22).

The authors realized that a novel means to affect CCL5-mediated recruitment of monocytes might be to block the interaction of CCL5 with HNP1. Thus, the group developed a short peptide (referred to as the SKY peptide) which specifically disturbed the interaction between human CCL5 and HNP1. When both human CCL5 and HNP1 were overexpressed in the murine heart by adeno-associated virus (AAV), classical monocytes showed exacerbated recruitment into the heart after ischemia-reperfusion of the left coronary. When cardiac function was assessed, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), contraction velocity (dP/dtmax) and relaxation velocity (dp/dtmin) deteriorated. Administration of SKY peptides completely abolished the worsening of cardiac function in this context. By contrast, overexpression of either CCL5 or HNP1 alone had no augmenting effect on monocyte accumulation in the heart after the procedure.

These data are consistent with the possibility that use of the SKY peptide may allow for a more selective therapeutic to block monocyte recruitment in the context of myocardial infarction and ensuing heart failure. There are, however, several critical questions that the field must address beforehand. First, is it always desirable to inhibit classical monocyte recruitment, given that these cells can promote healing in some settings? Second, is the heteromeric complex formed by HNP1-CCL5 only acting to recruit monocytes or is it also required to act with CCL5 in mediating T cell functions in adaptive immunity or angiogenesis? Third, might HNP1-CCL5 inhibition also find utility to treat atherosclerosis by blocking monocyte recruitment to plaque? Finally, the authors point out that the in vivo data implicating HNP1-CCL5 heteromeric complexes arises from in vivo overexpression systems, making it unclear if the heteromeric complexes truly assemble and function in natural settings. The latter is a critical issue that we suggest can be addressed by using non-invasive molecular imaging technique such as the development of SKY peptide-based positron emission tomography (PET) tracer to detect the formation of HNP1-CCL5 complexes in different organs and settings. More importantly, this PET reagent can be used not only as a diagnostic probe to read out the existence of a novel bioactive heteromer, but also provide key information about its dynamic concentration to better understand the therapeutic efficiency.


Acknowledgements

Funding: The authors are in part by the Banyu Fellowship Program sponsored by Banyu Life Science Foundation International and a grant from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL125655).


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Eltzschig HK, Eckle T. Ischemia and reperfusion--from mechanism to translation. Nat Med 2011;17:1391-401. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The Biological Basis for Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction: From Inflammation to Fibrosis. Circ Res 2016;119:91-112. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Liehn EA, Postea O, Curaj A, et al. Repair after myocardial infarction, between fantasy and reality: the role of chemokines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2357-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Cavalera M, Frangogiannis NG. Targeting the chemokines in cardiac repair. Curr Pharm Des 2014;20:1971-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Chouchani ET, Pell VR, Gaude E, et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 2014;515:431-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Soehnlein O, Zernecke A, Weber C. Neutrophils launch monocyte extravasation by release of granule proteins. Thromb Haemost 2009;102:198-205. [PubMed]
  7. Yan X, Anzai A, Katsumata Y, et al. Temporal dynamics of cardiac immune cell accumulation following acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2013;62:24-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Ingersoll MA, Spanbroek R, Lottaz C, et al. Comparison of gene expression profiles between human and mouse monocyte subsets. Blood 2010;115:e10-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Gautier EL, Jakubzick C, Randolph GJ. Regulation of the migration and survival of monocyte subsets by chemokine receptors and its relevance to atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009;29:1412-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Ancuta P, Liu KY, Misra V, et al. Transcriptional profiling reveals developmental relationship and distinct biological functions of CD16+ and CD16- monocyte subsets. BMC Genomics 2009;10:403. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Arnold L, Henry A, Poron F, et al. Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. J Exp Med 2007;204:1057-69. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Hilgendorf I, Gerhardt LM, Tan TC, Winter C, et al. Ly-6Chigh monocytes depend on Nr4a1 to balance both inflammatory and reparative phases in the infarcted myocardium. Circ Res 2014;114:1611-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Lavine KJ, Epelman S, Uchida K, et al. Distinct macrophage lineages contribute to disparate patterns of cardiac recovery and remodeling in the neonatal and adult heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:16029-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Sager HB, Hulsmans M, Lavine KJ, et al. Proliferation and Recruitment Contribute to Myocardial Macrophage Expansion in Chronic Heart Failure. Circ Res 2016;119:853-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Montecucco F, Braunersreuther V, Lenglet S, et al. CC chemokine CCL5 plays a central role impacting infarct size and post-infarction heart failure in mice. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1964-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Makino Y, Cook DN, Smithies O, et al. Impaired T cell function in RANTES-deficient mice. Clin Immunol 2002;102:302-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Tyner JW, Uchida O, Kajiwara N, et al. CCL5-CCR5 interaction provides antiapoptotic signals for macrophage survival during viral infection. Nat Med 2005;11:1180-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Westerweel PE, Rabelink TJ, Rookmaaker MB, et al. RANTES is required for ischaemia-induced angiogenesis, which may hamper RANTES-targeted anti-atherosclerotic therapy. Thromb Haemost 2008;99:794-5. [PubMed]
  19. Alard JE, Ortega-Gomez A, Wichapong K, et al. Recruitment of classical monocytes can be inhibited by disturbing heteromers of neutrophil HNP1 and platelet CCL5. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:317ra196. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Weissmüller T, Campbell EL, Rosenberger P, et al. PMNs facilitate translocation of platelets across human and mouse epithelium and together alter fluid homeostasis via epithelial cell-expressed ecto-NTPDases. J Clin Invest 2008;118:3682-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Burkhart JM, Vaudel M, Gambaryan S, et al. The first comprehensive and quantitative analysis of human platelet protein composition allows the comparative analysis of structural and functional pathways. Blood 2012;120:e73-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Lehrer RI, Lu W. α-Defensins in human innate immunity. Immunol Rev 2012;245:84-112. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Baba O, Liu Y, Randolph GJ. Defensin-chemokine heteromeric complexes derived from heterocellular activation—a possible target to inhibit CCL5 in cardiovascular settings. Ann Transl Med 2016;4(24):497. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.46